Saturday, 25 July 2015

Matt Rudd: The Lost Ark at the Natural History Museum

Below is an excerpt from a Sunday Times feature published on 31st May. I bet it is fascinating in the secret faults. I very much like the idea of having offshoots of the Natural History Museum - especially in the Northern Powerhouse like Manchester.
The Ark: Matt Rudd enters the secret vaults of the Natural History Museum - Millions of people visit the Natural History Museum every year — but they never see its hidden collection. Matt Rudd dissects some of its secrets:

If you spent just a minute examining each specimen on display at the Natural History Museum, you’d need 223 days nonstop to get around the place. Which would take dedication. But if you spent a minute on every specimen in the entire collection, you’d need another 152 years. Which would take a lot more dedication. You’d really have to love your fossils (they have 7m of them). And your lichens and algae (6m). And your parasitic wasps (they have 48 different species).

Of the 80m items at the museum, less than half a per cent is on show. The public displays are the tiniest tip of an iceberg. Beyond and beneath the grand halls of South Kensington, there are vast stores where the remaining 99.6%, 400 years of accumulated stuff, is kept. Thanks to the pesky British Museum Act 1963, it’s difficult to throw anything away. Even the 48th parasitic wasp. Even the "sacks and sacks" of stones, ingested and excreted by elephants and collected, enthusiastically I presume, by the nation’s favourite explorer, Dr Livingstone. Deaccessioning, as they call it, is strictly controlled.

Some critics have called it a scandal that such a vast collection is boxed up. Others have demanded a thorough spring clean followed by an auctioning off to fill dwindling coffers. Lot 483: six sacks of excreted stones.

Certainly, you could make a case for opening regional branches of the museum. There is an outpost in Tring, Hertfordshire, but what about Manchester or Liverpool? In the current climate of decentralisation, couldn’t Newcastle show off a few dinosaurs? Couldn’t the Northern Powerhouse plan include a good wedge of natural history?

The rest of the article can be found here.

 

 

 

No comments: